Noida, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 93

Introduction

Feature	Details
Project Name	Purvanchal Silver City (also listed as “Silver City I” / “Silver City-1,” to distinguish it from the Greater Noida sister project Purvanchal Silver City II)
Developer	Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited (CIN U74899DL1994PTC061109) — named as builder of record on RealEstateIndia.com; a separate entity, Purvanchal Projects Private Limited, runs the developer’s current corporate site and newer projects
Location	Plot No. 93/01, Sector 93, Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (PIN code not disclosed in any source checked)
Project Type	Residential apartments (group housing)
RERA Number	Not independently verified. The number shown on property portals, UPRERAAGT10119, does not match UP-RERA’s project registration format and is also cited elsewhere for an unrelated Ghaziabad project — see Hidden Information section below
Total Land Area	Conflicting figures: 12.13 acres per one source, 23 acres per another; not reconciled
Total Units / Plots	644 units (consistent across sources), spread across a tower count that is itself disputed — 21 towers is the most repeated figure, with some sources citing 10 or 17
Configuration	3 BHK (1,135–1,765 sq. ft.); 4 BHK (2,495–3,750 sq. ft. depending on source); scattered 2 BHK listings from ₹19 lakh that could not be corroborated
Possession	Ready to move — sources place actual completion anywhere between 2007 and 2012; exact date not pinned down
Launch Price	Not disclosed — no primary source located
Payment Plan	Not applicable — the project is fully sold out; every current transaction is a resale
Current Status	Ready to Move, resale market only

Purvanchal Silver City sits on the Noida–Greater Noida Expressway frontage in Sector 93, a stretch of Noida that has filled in considerably since this project was built. It is old stock by Noida standards: 644 units across what most listings describe as 21 towers, sold out and handed over somewhere in the 2007–2012 window, and now trading entirely on the resale market. There is no live developer inventory, no construction-linked payment plan, and no ongoing sales office to walk into.

That also means there is no RERA project registration to check, and this is the first thing a buyer needs to understand clearly rather than skim past. The registration number that property portals attach to this listing, UPRERAAGT10119, follows the prefix format UP-RERA uses for real estate agent registrations, not project registrations. The same number turns up attached to a completely unrelated project in Ghaziabad. It looks like a broker’s agent-registration number that got mislabeled as the project’s RERA number somewhere in the aggregator data chain. The project’s age likely places it outside RERA’s registration mandate anyway, since it appears to have received completion before the Act’s May 2017 cutoff, which is a legally normal situation, not a red flag on its own. But it is a different situation from “has RERA registration,” and buyers relying on the number shown on 99acres or Square Yards should know it is not proof of anything.

Beyond the RERA question, this review will flag two more unresolved discrepancies up front rather than at the bottom: the land area and tower count are cited inconsistently across sources, and the current asking price per square foot varies by nearly 60% depending on which portal you check. None of these gaps make Silver City a bad purchase by default. Plenty of resale-market Noida properties from this era carry similar documentation gaps. But they do mean this is a buy-with-your-eyes-open situation, and a buyer’s own verification (site visit, title check, independent valuation) matters more here than the marketing copy.

Key Highlights

• 644 total units, a figure consistent across nearly every source checked.
• Most sources describe 21 towers of 9 floors each; a minority cite 10 or 17 towers, not reconciled.
• Land area cited as either 12.13 acres or 23 acres depending on the source, with no single authoritative document located.
• Configuration runs 3 BHK (1,135–1,765 sq. ft.) and 4 BHK (2,495–3,750 sq. ft.); a small number of 2 BHK listings from ₹19 lakh appear on one aggregator but could not be corroborated on a specific unit.
• Fronts the Noida–Greater Noida Expressway, a six-lane, access-controlled corridor operational since 2002.
• Noida Metro Aqua Line’s Sector 83 station is cited at either roughly 1 km or roughly 3 km from the project depending on the source, not independently confirmed via a map tool.
• A new metro corridor (Sector 142 to Botanical Garden, 11.56 km, 8 stations) includes a planned “Noida Sector-93” station, cabinet-approved as of February 2026; no construction timeline has been published.
• Yatharth Super Speciality Hospital is roughly 2–2.7 km away, depending on source.
• Sector 110’s local market is about 2 km away; DLF Mall of India and Gulshan One29 are roughly 10 km out.
• No verified RERA project registration number exists for this project; the number in wide circulation appears to be a misattributed agent registration.
• Ready to move since somewhere between 2007 and 2012; sources disagree on the exact year.
• Current asking rate is cited anywhere from ₹9,800 to ₹15,975 per sq. ft. depending on the source and date.
• Units currently listed from roughly ₹1.45–1.54 crore for 3 BHK and up to ₹6 crore for larger 4 BHK stock.
• Sector 93’s average apartment rate is about ₹14,350/sq. ft., putting Silver City’s asking price roughly in line with, or modestly above, its immediate locality.
• Sector 93 apartment prices are reported down 2.8% over the trailing year even as citywide Noida prices have risen sharply, worth noting against an 18-year-old building competing with newer product.
• Rental range cited at ₹25,500–₹95,000/month, reflecting the spread between smaller 3 BHK and larger 4 BHK units.
• Developer named on project listings is Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited, incorporated 1994, a different legal entity from Purvanchal Projects Private Limited, the company behind the developer’s current website and newer RERA-registered projects.
• Both entities share the same registered office in Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi.
• Developer claims 32 projects delivered and 11,000+ customers on its own site, but a separate figure elsewhere cites “3,500 units delivered”; the two claims do not obviously reconcile.
• Amenities listed include a swimming pool, gym, clubhouse, sports courts, and landscaped gardens, but no clubhouse square footage is disclosed anywhere.
• No fire-safety NOC documentation, lift-to-unit ratio, or EV charging provision was found in any source checked.

Amenities

Club & Lifestyle Amenities

A clubhouse is listed across aggregators, along with a swimming pool and gymnasium. No source discloses the clubhouse’s square footage, and no official project brochure was reachable to check against: the project’s page on the developer’s own site returned a 404 when checked directly. One resident-review aggregation also mentions a sauna, which does not appear on the standard amenity lists from other portals.

Sports & Fitness Facilities

Badminton court, lawn tennis court, a multipurpose court, and a jogging track are listed. No dimensions or number of courts are specified anywhere.

Family & Community Features

Children’s play area, landscaped gardens/park, party hall, and a yoga area appear across listings. No senior-citizen zone or dedicated barbecue area was found in any source.

Safety & Convenience

24/7 security with CCTV surveillance and power backup are listed. Construction specifications cited by Square Yards mention an RCC frame structure with vitrified tile and laminated wooden flooring. No lift or elevator count is disclosed for any tower, and no source mentions EV charging provision.

Retail & Utility

No retail or in-project utility shops are mentioned in any source checked. Residents rely on the Sector 110 market, roughly 2 km away, for daily needs.

What Is Missing: The amenity list found across aggregators reads as fairly standard for a mid-2000s Noida group-housing project, but almost nothing is backed by a specific number. Clubhouse square footage is unspecified. Lift-to-unit ratio is unspecified. No fire-safety or occupancy NOC documentation was located, which would ordinarily be checkable through a RERA filing, but since no verified RERA project registration exists here, there is no filing to check against. EV charging is not mentioned at all, unsurprising for a project this age but worth confirming directly if it matters to a buyer. None of this was pulled from an official developer brochure; the project’s page on purvanchalprojects.com was not reachable, so everything above comes from third-party aggregator listings rather than a primary source.

Prime Location — Purvanchal Silver City

Sector 93 sits along the Noida–Greater Noida Expressway, a six-lane corridor that has been operational since 2002 and serves a run of sectors including 93, 94, 96, 100, 105, 108, 110, 124, and 125. The project’s frontage on this expressway is its clearest, most verifiable location asset. The area has also seen a Noida Authority-cleared beautification plan for the adjoining Sector 93A stretch (Hajipur Square to Eldeco Society, roughly 3 km), worth roughly ₹35 crore, covering footpath widening, lighting, and streetscape work; approved, not yet reported complete.

The more interesting recent development is a new metro corridor between Sector 142 and Botanical Garden, 11.56 km with 8 stations, cabinet-approved in February 2026. It includes a planned “Noida Sector-93” station along with stops at Botanical Garden, Sector-44, Noida Office, Sector-97, Sector-105, and Sector-108. This is a genuine, verifiable, recently-approved project directly relevant to this location, but “cabinet-approved” is not “under construction,” and no completion timeline was found in any source checked. A buyer weighing this project partly on future metro access should treat it as a multi-year prospect, not a near-term amenity.

Destination	Distance / Drive Time
Noida Sector 83 Metro Station (Aqua Line, operational)	Approx. 1–3 km — sources conflict, not verified via map tool
Planned “Noida Sector-93” Metro Station (new corridor)	On-sector — cabinet-approved February 2026, not yet built
Yatharth Super Speciality Hospital	Approx. 2–2.7 km — not verified via map tool
Sector 110 local market	Approx. 2 km — not verified via map tool
DLF Mall of India / Gulshan One29	Approx. 10 km — not verified via map tool
Noida–Greater Noida Expressway access	Adjoining the project frontage
Noida International Airport (Jewar)	Approx. 45–55 km, with sources ranging 35–60 km depending on route — low confidence, recommend a map-tool spot check
Noida city centre (Sector 18)	Not disclosed in any source checked

Major Location Advantages

• Direct frontage on the Noida–Greater Noida Expressway, an established, operational six-lane road.
• Yatharth Super Speciality Hospital within roughly 2–2.7 km.
• Sector 110 local market within roughly 2 km for daily needs.
• A cabinet-approved metro corridor with a station planned for Sector 93 itself, though years from completion.
• Access to DLF Mall of India and Gulshan One29 within roughly 10 km.

What the Marketing Doesn’t Tell You

The project is 18 or more years old by any of the completion dates cited, and it is competing on price against newer Sector 93 launches that offer current-generation amenities, updated fire and safety compliance, and, in many cases, RERA-registered status with an active grievance mechanism. Sector 93’s apartment prices are reported to have fallen 2.8% over the trailing year even while Noida overall has seen sharp appreciation, a pattern consistent with older stock like this underperforming newer product nearby, though this specific project’s own price trend was not separately isolated in the sources checked. The metro-station distance itself is uncertain by a factor of three (1 km versus 3 km) depending on which source is consulted, which matters if walkability to the Aqua Line is part of the pitch. And the planned Sector 93 station on the new corridor, while a real approval, comes with no published construction start or completion date. Treat it as a long-term possibility, not a reason to pay a premium today.

Pricing & Configuration

Configuration	Size (Sq. Ft.)	Starting Price	All-In Estimated Cost
3 BHK	1,135–1,765	₹1,45,00,000–₹1,54,00,000 (cited range; sources vary)	Not disclosed — resale transactions are negotiated individually
4 BHK	2,495–3,750	₹3,25,00,000–₹6,00,00,000 (cited range; sources vary)	Not disclosed — resale transactions are negotiated individually

The per-square-foot figures behind these ranges do not agree with each other. Square Yards’ own data shows two different numbers within the same source cluster: a current asking rate of ₹13,650/sq. ft. (up from ₹13,250/sq. ft. the prior quarter) alongside a separate “median price” metric of ₹9,800/sq. ft., a nearly 30% gap that the source itself does not explain, possibly reflecting a different calculation basis such as unit-size mix or an older snapshot. NoBroker, in an August 2026 listing, puts the average asking rate at ₹15,975/sq. ft. This review is not going to pick one of these numbers and present it as the figure. A buyer should ask any seller or broker for the specific comparable transactions behind their quoted rate rather than trusting a single portal average.

Against that spread, Sector 93’s broader apartment average sits around ₹14,350/sq. ft., with the overall sector average (all property types) closer to ₹13,600/sq. ft. Silver City’s asking price is therefore roughly in line with, to modestly above, its immediate locality: not a clear discount, despite being older stock, and not a clear premium either.

Price Includes

Not disclosed by any source checked. This is a resale-only market: there is no developer BSP, and what a quoted price includes (parking, club membership, maintenance deposit) is negotiated between individual buyer, seller, and broker rather than published project-wide.

Additional Charges

Not disclosed by any source checked, for the same reason. PLC, IFMS, GST treatment on resale, and registry/stamp duty are not published anywhere for this project and would need to be confirmed directly in each transaction. Standard Uttar Pradesh stamp duty and registration charges apply to any Noida resale purchase; the current statutory rates were not looked up as part of this research and should be confirmed separately with a lawyer or the sub-registrar’s office rather than assumed.

Payment Plan

Not applicable. Purvanchal Silver City has no active developer sale and no construction-linked payment schedule. The project sold out and was handed over years ago, and every current transaction is a resale between private parties, typically settled through a bank loan or direct payment agreed between buyer and seller rather than any staged plan.

Builder Profile

Particulars	Details
Legal Entity Name	Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited (builder of record for this project, per RealEstateIndia.com)
CIN / Registration Number	U74899DL1994PTC061109
Incorporation Date	26 August 1994
Registered Office	LSC A-7, 2nd Floor, Purvanchal Plaza, Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi – 110091
Founder / MD	Directors per Tofler/ZaubaCorp/ClearTax indexes (not independently confirmed against a live MCA pull): Nikhat Parveen, Arshad Imam, Aftab Alam
Claimed Experience	“Building Unmatched Landmarks Since 1994” (developer’s own site)
Delivered Projects	32 projects / approx. 22.36 million sq. ft. claimed by the developer; a separate claim elsewhere cites 3,500 units delivered — the two figures do not reconcile
Clients Served	11,000+ claimed (one variant cites 10,000+); self-reported 4.82-star rating from 2,488 reviews on the developer’s own site
Other Entities	Purvanchal Projects Private Limited (CIN U70102DL2010PTC200716, incorporated 25 March 2010, same registered office) — the current flagship entity behind Royal Atlantis, Skyline Vista, Sunbliss, Royal City, Kings Court, Capital Tower, Silver City II, Silver Estate, and Business World

Purvanchal Silver City was built and sold under Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited, a company incorporated in 1994. The brand’s current public face, however, runs through a different legal entity: Purvanchal Projects Private Limited, incorporated in 2010, which operates the developer’s website, carries the newer RERA-registered projects, and reports operating revenue above ₹500 crore for the year ending March 2025 per Tofler. Both entities list the same registered office in Mayur Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi, and the surname “Alam” recurs across both: Shah Alam is Founder, Chairman, and Managing Director of the 2010 entity. This is not unusual for a developer family running multiple companies over three decades, but it does mean the company legally accountable for Silver City is not the one a buyer would be contracting with on any of Purvanchal’s current projects, and it is worth understanding which entity actually stands behind a resale purchase here: typically the original builder of record and the seller, not the newer corporate entity, regardless of what brand name appears on marketing material.

The developer’s claimed scale (32 delivered projects, over 22 million sq. ft., 11,000-plus customers) is a self-reported figure from its own website, with a self-reported 4.82-star rating drawn from its own review count rather than an independent platform. A separate figure surfacing elsewhere puts total delivered units at 3,500, which sits awkwardly next to the 32-projects claim once you consider that Silver City alone accounts for 644 units. No RERA-verified delivered-project count or complaint history could be compiled for this review; the one specific signal found was a roughly two-year gap between an original RERA-stated completion date (around March 2023) and third-party “ready to move” reporting (2025) for Purvanchal Royal City Phase II, a different, newer project, worth confirming independently on up-rera.in before treating it as a pattern but a data point buyers researching this developer’s current projects should be aware of. No RERA complaints or organized buyer disputes specific to Silver City itself were found, though the project predates RERA’s project-specific complaint regime, so the absence is not strong evidence either way.

Risk Assessment — Positive Factors

• 644 units sold and occupied, with the project functioning as an established residential society rather than a construction-stage bet.
• Direct frontage on the operational, six-lane Noida–Greater Noida Expressway.
• Sector 93’s average apartment rate (~₹14,350/sq. ft.) shows Silver City’s asking price is not carrying a premium over its immediate locality despite the building’s age.
• A cabinet-approved (February 2026) new metro corridor includes a station planned specifically for Sector 93.
• General resident reviews on a third-party platform cite an average rating of roughly 4.1/5 from 969 ratings, with comments describing the society as organized and secure (attributed to that platform, not independently verified).
• Recorded resale transaction activity (12 registered transactions totaling ₹22 crore through August 2026, per one source) indicates an active, liquid resale market rather than a dormant listing.

Risk Assessment — Limitations

• No independently verifiable RERA project registration exists for this project; the number in wide circulation on property portals (UPRERAAGT10119) follows UP-RERA’s agent-registration prefix format, not the project-registration format, and is also cited for an unrelated Ghaziabad project.
• Because no RERA filing exists to check against, there is no independently verifiable amenity specification, fire-safety NOC, or occupancy certificate reference for this project available through the usual RERA route.
• Current asking price per sq. ft. is cited inconsistently even within a single source cluster (₹9,800 versus ₹13,650 versus ₹15,975/sq. ft.), making it difficult for a buyer to benchmark a specific quoted price with confidence.
• Land area (12.13 acres versus 23 acres) and tower count (21 versus 10 or 17) are cited inconsistently across sources, meaning even the project’s basic physical footprint is not settled.
• The legal entity that built and sold this project (Purvanchal Construction Works Pvt. Ltd., incorporated 1994) is distinct from the entity behind the developer’s current brand and newer RERA-registered projects (Purvanchal Projects Pvt. Ltd., incorporated 2010), relevant to understanding who actually stands behind representations made about this specific project today.
• The building is 18-plus years old by any of the cited completion dates, competing on price against newer Sector 93 launches with current-generation compliance and amenities.
• This is a resale-only market: no developer warranty, no construction-linked payment protection, and pricing/charges are negotiated per transaction rather than published, so a buyer has less standardized documentation to lean on than in a primary sale.
• Exact possession/completion date is unresolved across sources (2007 to 2012), which matters for assessing the age and remaining useful life of building systems (structure, plumbing, electrical, lifts).
• Bank financing and resale liquidity for a project without a verifiable RERA number may face additional scrutiny or documentation requirements from some lenders. This was not tested directly in this research and should be confirmed with a lender before assuming a loan will be straightforward.

The Hidden Information Between the Lines

The RERA number problem is the most important finding here, and it is worth walking through precisely because the honest conclusion is more nuanced than “no RERA, avoid.” UP-RERA’s project registration numbers follow the format UPRERAPRJ followed by digits, confirmed against Purvanchal’s own other projects (Kings Court: UPRERAPRJ3102, Royal Atlantis Phase 1: UPRERAPRJ546517, Royal City: UPRERAPRJ3137, Skyline Vista: UPRERAPRJ770757). The number attached to Silver City across aggregators, UPRERAAGT10119, uses the UPRERAAGT prefix instead, which UP-RERA’s own agent-registration user manual confirms is used for real estate agent and broker registrations, not projects. The same number also appears attached to an entirely unrelated project, Ramprastha Greens Pearl Court in Ghaziabad, built by a different developer altogether, which cannot happen with a genuine project-specific registration. The most plausible explanation is that a broker’s agent registration number got pulled into aggregator listing data and mislabeled as the project’s RERA number, and it has been propagating across portals since. Separately, the project’s likely completion date (2007–2012) predates RERA’s May 2017 registration cutoff, meaning it may never have needed a project registration in the first place, a legally unremarkable situation on its own but a materially different one from what a buyer sees when a portal displays what looks like a valid RERA number next to the listing.

The entity structure adds a second layer to check before signing anything. Silver City was built and sold under Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited, incorporated in 1994. The developer’s current public-facing brand (the website, the “32 projects / 30 years” claims, the newer RERA-registered launches) runs through Purvanchal Projects Private Limited, incorporated in 2010, a separate legal person sharing the same registered office and evidently the same promoter family. A resale buyer today is not contracting with either of these companies directly (the transaction is between the current owner-seller and the buyer), but anyone evaluating “Purvanchal” as a developer brand based on its current marketing should know that the entity accountable for this specific 2007–2012 project is not the entity issuing today’s claims about delivered scale and customer counts.

Those claims themselves do not fully add up. The developer’s own site claims 32 delivered projects and over 22 million sq. ft. built, alongside a separate figure circulating elsewhere of 3,500 total units delivered, a number that becomes hard to square once you note that Silver City alone accounts for 644 of those units. Neither figure was independently audited in this research; both are presented here as competing developer claims rather than resolved facts, and a buyer should not average them into a single “true” number.

Finally, the amenity and specification gaps are worth naming plainly rather than assuming they are standard for the project’s age. No clubhouse square footage, no lift-to-unit ratio, and no fire-safety NOC reference were found in any source, including the developer’s own site, whose page for this specific project was unreachable. For a fully-built, occupied project, these gaps are less about approval risk (the building already exists and is lived in) and more about a buyer’s ability to verify building-system condition and compliance independently. In the absence of RERA-filed documentation, that means an on-site inspection and a request for the residents’ welfare association’s own records becomes more important than it would be for a newer, RERA-registered property.

Questions to Consider Before Investing

1. Can the seller or broker produce a UP-RERA project registration number for Silver City that resolves on up-rera.in, or confirm in writing that the project predates RERA’s registration requirement?
2. Which legal entity or individual will actually sign the resale sale agreement, and has their title to the specific unit been verified through a lawyer’s search of the chain of ownership?
3. What is the actual, documented year of possession for this specific tower or unit, given that sources cite anywhere from 2007 to 2012?
4. Can the seller confirm the exact land area and tower count for the project, and reconcile the 12.13-acre versus 23-acre and 21-tower versus 10/17-tower discrepancies found across public listings?
5. What specific comparable transactions support the quoted per-square-foot price, given the roughly ₹9,800 to ₹15,975/sq. ft. range found across sources?
6. Has the building undergone any structural, plumbing, or electrical audit in the last five years, and can that report be shared?
7. What is the clubhouse’s actual square footage and current condition, and which listed amenities (pool, gym, courts) are functional today versus listed but defunct?
8. Is there a resident welfare association, and can it confirm current maintenance charges, any pending litigation, and the building’s fire-safety compliance status?
9. Has the bank being approached for financing flagged any issue with lending against a property lacking a verifiable RERA registration number?
10. What stamp duty, registration charges, and any applicable capital gains considerations apply to this specific resale transaction, confirmed with a lawyer rather than estimated?
11. Is there any documentation connecting the current owner-seller back to the original allotment from Purvanchal Construction Works Private Limited, closing any gap in the ownership chain?
12. What is the realistic timeline for the planned Sector 93 metro station, beyond its February 2026 cabinet approval, and should that timeline factor into the price being paid today?

Who Should Consider This Project

• End-use buyers who want an occupied, functioning residential society today rather than a construction-stage commitment, and who can complete independent legal and structural verification before purchase.
• Buyers prioritizing expressway connectivity and an established, lived-in neighborhood over new-building amenities and compliance documentation.
• Buyers who are financing through cash or a lender already comfortable underwriting resale properties without a verifiable RERA number, and who have budgeted for a lawyer’s title and structural review as a condition of purchase.
• Long-horizon holders who are not depending on near-term appreciation tied to the planned Sector 93 metro station, given its uncertain construction timeline.

Who Should Not Consider This Project

• Short-term investors expecting price appreciation on the back of the project’s own newness or amenities: the building is 18-plus years old and price trends in Sector 93 apartments have been flat to negative over the trailing year.
• Buyers who need bank financing and have not first confirmed with their specific lender that a property without a verifiable RERA registration number will be approved without complication.
• Buyers who want the standardized documentation of a primary sale (a published price list, a developer payment plan, a builder-buyer agreement with RERA-mandated disclosures), none of which exist here.
• Risk-averse first-time buyers who are not prepared to commission their own structural and legal due diligence, given the absence of any RERA-filed specification or NOC record to lean on.

Honest Verdict

What Purvanchal Silver City actually offers is straightforward: 644 occupied units on an expressway-fronting plot in a Noida sector that has matured considerably since the building went up, priced roughly in line with its immediate locality, with an active resale market and a plausible future metro connection still years from completion. None of that is a bad starting point for an end-use buyer who values an established, lived-in society over new-construction gloss.

The core problem is documentation, not location. This project has no RERA number a buyer can verify, and the number in circulation on major portals appears to be someone else’s broker registration attached to the wrong listing. Basic facts as elementary as land area and tower count are not settled across sources. Price-per-square-foot quotes for the same project, from the same source cluster, differ by close to 30%. None of these gaps individually sink the project. A pre-2017 building legitimately can sit outside RERA’s registration mandate, and resale markets are inherently less standardized than primary sales, but together they mean a buyer here is relying far more heavily on their own legal and structural due diligence than on any published, verifiable project record.

The actionable path is narrow but workable: verify title and possession history directly through a property lawyer rather than through portal listings, get a structural and systems assessment given the building’s age, confirm financing terms with a specific lender before assuming a loan will go through smoothly, and price the unit against actual comparable transactions rather than any single portal’s asking-rate figure. Buyers unwilling to do that homework should look elsewhere in Sector 93, where newer, RERA-registered stock offers a cleaner paper trail even at a similar price point.

Purvanchal Silver City is not a project to avoid outright, but it is a project where the seller’s and broker’s claims need to be checked against a lawyer’s findings, not taken at face value.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information gathered through independent research as of September 2026. No financial advice is implied. Always consult a RERA-registered real estate agent and an independent property lawyer before making any real estate investment.