Faridabad, Haryana — Sector 88 (RPS City, Kheri Road)

Introduction

Feature	Details
Project Name	RPS Savana
Developer	RPS Infrastructure Limited
Location	RPS City, Kheri Road, Sector 88, Faridabad, Haryana 121002
Project Type	Apartments (Group Housing), plus two commercial blocks (RPS Savana Arcade and RPS Savana Galleria)
RERA Number	Cited by some property portals as HRERA 660/2017/307 — could not be independently confirmed on haryanarera.gov.in in this review; not found in either the Gurugram-authority or the Panchkula-authority (RERA-PKL) project listings checked
Total Land Area	41.40 acres
Total Units	2,300–2,350 apartments across 27 towers of 17 floors, figures vary slightly by source
Configuration	2 BHK (1,273–1,339 sq ft), 2 BHK+Study (1,339 sq ft), 3 BHK (1,458–1,661 sq ft), 3 BHK+Servant (1,862 sq ft), 4 BHK+Servant (2,360 sq ft), 4 BHK Penthouse (2,390–2,426 sq ft)
Possession	Substantially delivered; 6,500+ residents already living there. At least one documented unit was handed over only in December 2023, after being booked in December 2009
Launch Price	Not disclosed as a clean figure anywhere in this research. A 2023 consumer court judgment records a buyer who paid ₹14,63,095 against a unit booked on 12 December 2009 — a data point, not a full price list
Payment Plan	Not applicable in the way it would be for a new launch — RPS Savana is 17 years past its original booking window and is now a mixed resale and remaining-builder-inventory market
Current Status	Ready to Move; listed both on resale platforms and, as of this research, still on RPS Group’s own website with indicative pricing

RPS Savana is one of the older large-format apartment complexes in Faridabad, part of RPS Infrastructure Limited’s roughly 100-acre RPS City development in Sector 88. Bookings for the project date back to at least 2007–2009, which puts its origin nearly a decade before India’s Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act came into force. Today the towers are built, occupied, and the society has working amenities — this is not a “coming soon” project with a construction-linked payment plan attached to it.

What makes this review different from most on this site is that the risk is not “will it get built.” It got built. The risk sits in two other places: whether the RERA paperwork that portals casually cite actually exists and is current, and what the project’s own history says about how RPS Infrastructure treats buyers when things go wrong. On the second point, the record is not clean — a 2023 consumer court order, an ongoing residents’ campaign, and a 2024 fight over who controls the society’s maintenance all point the same direction, and none of that shows up in the glossy listings.

Key Highlights

• RPS Savana sits on 41.40 acres inside RPS City, off Kheri Road in Sector 88, Faridabad — the same township that also hosts Amrita Hospital.
• 27 towers of 17 floors each, holding 2,300–2,350 apartments (sources are not fully consistent on the exact count), plus two commercial blocks, RPS Savana Arcade and RPS Savana Galleria.
• Configurations run from 2 BHK at 1,273 sq ft up to a 4 BHK penthouse at roughly 2,426 sq ft.
• Current asking prices by configuration: 2 BHK ₹62–68 lakh, 2 BHK+Study ₹70–78 lakh, 3 BHK ₹85–95 lakh, 3 BHK+Servant ₹99 lakh–1.10 crore, 4 BHK+Servant ₹1.70–1.90 crore, 4 BHK Penthouse ₹1.70–1.80 crore.
• One tracking source puts the average rate at ₹8,800 per sq ft in Q1 2026, up from around ₹7,850 per sq ft — about a 12% rise in one quarter, which is worth verifying independently before treating it as a trend.
• The developer, RPS Infrastructure Limited, is registered under CIN U45201DL2005PLC140779, incorporated 15 September 2005, registered office in Jasola, New Delhi — a different city from where the project is actually built.
• Directors on record with the MCA: Manoj Verma, Amit Kumar Singh, and Shanti Parkash (Whole-Time Director). Authorized capital ₹50 crore, paid-up capital ₹38.75 crore.
• RPS Group’s other Sector 88 projects — RPS Palms, RPS Palm Drive, and RPS Auria — sit in the same RPS City footprint.
• Around 6,500 residents are reported to already be living in RPS Savana, and 100+ resale listings were active on aggregator platforms at the time of this research.
• A Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission order (C.C. 1246/2018, decided 31 July 2023) found RPS Infrastructure Ltd deficient in service over a Sector 88 unit — booked 12 December 2009, with possession contractually due around September 2012, but not physically handed over until 14 December 2023.
• That same order awarded the buyer ₹5 per sq ft per month in delay compensation for the entire gap period, plus ₹1,00,000 for mental agony and harassment and ₹50,000 in litigation costs.
• A long-running Facebook community, “Victims of RPS,” documents buyers who booked flats around 2007 and describe waiting eight or more years for possession without receiving the delay penalties they say they were promised.
• Residents interviewed in that community cite “escalation free” clauses in their buyer agreements as the reason the builder gave for not paying possession-delay compensation.
• The Savana Welfare Association reportedly took over the society’s maintenance from the builder on 1 February 2024 — 17 years after the project’s original launch — after what residents describe as resistance from RPS.
• A Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal cause list dated 21 July 2026 shows a matter titled “Varun Singla Vs M/s RPS Infrastructure Ltd Faridabad” still listed for hearing; the substance of that dispute was not established from the public cause list alone.
• Amrita Hospital, a large tertiary care facility, is reported to be about 2.3 km away within the same RPS City area.
• No official, current, single price list from the developer could be located; RPS Group’s own site for the project explicitly warns visitors that “data may be inaccurate” and is subject to change.

Amenities

Club & Lifestyle Amenities

RPS Savana has an operating clubhouse with a swimming pool — resident reviews separately mention a “Water Court,” a lap pool, and a kids’ pool, along with a gymnasium and a spa. Square footage for the clubhouse itself is not disclosed in any source checked.

Sports & Fitness Facilities

Tennis, badminton, and basketball courts, a jogging track, and a skating rink are listed consistently across aggregators and resident reviews.

Family & Community Features

Children’s play areas, a community hall, and landscaped gardens are part of the complex — the developer’s marketing claims 85% of the 41.40-acre site is landscaping, with the remaining 15% built up.

Safety & Convenience

24/7 CCTV security, power backup, and fiber-optic connectivity with intercom are listed. Elevator and parking specifics — number of lifts per tower, covered vs. open parking ratios — are not disclosed anywhere checked in this research.

Retail & Utility

RPS Savana Arcade and RPS Savana Galleria serve as the project’s retail component, though the current occupancy and mix of these commercial blocks were not verifiable from this research.

What Is Missing: Water source is not clearly stated — marketing references DTH/RO systems and rainwater harvesting, but does not say whether the underlying supply is municipal or borewell. A 2023 news report on Greater Faridabad found 41 of 56 surveyed residential societies lacked authorized municipal water connections, though RPS City and RPS Savana specifically were not named in that report, so this is regional context rather than a confirmed fact about this project. Buyers should ask directly.

Prime Location — RPS Savana

Sector 88 is one of the more built-out pockets of Greater Faridabad, and RPS City in particular functions as a self-contained mini-township — RPS Savana isn’t reliant on distant, unbuilt “upcoming” infrastructure the way many newer launches in the outer sectors are. Amrita Hospital, a genuine, operating tertiary hospital, sits within the same RPS City footprint, which is a real and checkable locational asset rather than a promised one.

That said, the sector still depends heavily on road transport. The nearest metro stations are not walkable, and while the developer’s own marketing cites a five-minute drive to the Delhi–Mumbai Expressway corridor, this review could not independently verify the precise distance from a map source and treats it as a developer claim rather than a confirmed figure.

Destination	Distance / Drive Time
Amrita Hospital, RPS City	~2.3 km
Asian Institute of Medical Sciences	~7 km
Badkal Mor / Old Faridabad Metro Stations	~4.6 km (nearest metro access, per locality data for the RPS City/Kheri Road area)
Faridabad Railway Station	~6.1 km
Ballabgarh Railway Station	~11 km
Delhi border (Badarpur)	~17 km
Central Delhi	~35 km

Major Location Advantages

• Located inside an already-built, occupied township (RPS City), not a plotted layout awaiting future development.
• Amrita Hospital is a real, operating facility in the immediate vicinity, not a proposed one.
• Direct access claimed to NH-2 (Delhi–Agra Highway) corridor and proximity to the Delhi–Mumbai Expressway.
• Established retail and social infrastructure within Sector 88 given the age of the development.

What the Marketing Doesn’t Tell You

The “10 minutes to Badkhal Metro” and “5 minutes to the Delhi–Mumbai Expressway” figures that appear on developer and channel-partner pages are drive-time claims, not measured distances, and this review could not independently confirm them against map data. The nearest metro stations are roughly 4.6 km away by road — a genuine drive, not a walk, regardless of how the minutes are framed. And while Sector 88 is more built-up than Faridabad’s newer outer sectors, that also means this is not a growth story — the location has already matured, so buying here is a bet on stability and liquidity, not on future infrastructure lifting values.

Pricing & Configuration

Configuration	Size (Sq. Ft.)	Asking Price Range
2 BHK	1,273	₹62–68 lakh
2 BHK + Study	1,339	₹70–78 lakh
3 BHK	1,458–1,661	₹85–95 lakh
3 BHK + Servant	3 BHK + Servant	₹99 lakh – ₹1.10 crore
4 BHK + Servant	2,360	₹1.70–1.90 crore
4 BHK Penthouse	2,390–2,426	₹1.70–1.80 crore

These figures come from aggregator and channel-partner listings rather than a single official price sheet — no current, dated builder price list was located during this research. Treat the ranges as indicative asking prices, not confirmed transaction values.

One tracking source cites an average rate of roughly ₹8,800 per sq ft as of Q1 2026, against ₹7,850 per sq ft the previous quarter. That is broadly in line with resale rates seen in nearby Sector 88 projects on Kheri Road, where similar-vintage apartment resale has recently traded in the ₹7,000–9,200 per sq ft range. A 12% quarter-on-quarter jump on an aggregator’s estimate is worth treating with some skepticism — these figures are frequently modeled from asking prices, not registered sale deeds, and can move on thin listing volume.

Price Includes

Not disclosed in any source checked in this research. Since this is functionally a resale/secondary market rather than a builder-sale-with-fresh-agreement market, what a specific listed price includes (parking, IFMS balance, club membership already paid by the seller) varies deal to deal and needs to be confirmed with each individual seller.

Additional Charges

• Registry and stamp duty, payable on transfer of the specific unit
• Any outstanding IFMS or maintenance dues from the seller, which a buyer should confirm are cleared before purchase
• Parking allocation and any transfer charges the society may levy on ownership change
• Club membership transfer fee, if the society charges one

Payment Plan

Not applicable. There is no active construction-linked payment plan on record for RPS Savana; a buyer today is either purchasing resale from an existing owner (paid in full or via bank loan, direct to the seller) or, per RPS Group’s own website, potentially still-unsold builder inventory at listed price — a distinction worth clarifying with the seller before proceeding, since the obligations and paper trail differ.

Builder Profile

Particulars	Details
Legal Entity Name	RPS Infrastructure Limited
CIN	U45201DL2005PLC140779
Incorporation Date	15 September 2005
Registered Office	Jasola District Centre, New Delhi
Directors on Record	Manoj Verma, Amit Kumar Singh, Shanti Parkash (Whole-Time Director)
Claimed Experience	Multiple projects across Faridabad’s Sector 88 (RPS City), including Savana, Palms, Palm Drive, and Auria
Delivered Projects	RPS Savana itself is largely delivered and occupied (6,500+ residents reported); full company-wide delivered count not independently verified
Other Entities	Public appellate tribunal listings reference both “RPS Infrastructure Ltd” and “RPS Infrastructure Pvt Ltd” as separate named parties in different matters — worth clarifying which entity a buyer would actually be contracting with
Compliance Status	Listed as compliant per MCA records at the time of this research

RPS Infrastructure Limited was incorporated in 2005, and RPS Savana — its flagship Sector 88 project — took its first bookings within a couple of years of that, starting around 2007. That makes this one of the older private developments in Faridabad still being actively marketed today, and it means the bulk of the project’s construction and initial handovers happened entirely outside the framework RERA later created in 2016.

The company’s delivery record on Savana specifically is mixed rather than clean. A large batch of roughly 1,350 units was reported handed over by the end of 2015, which suggests most of the project moved reasonably close to its intended schedule. But the 2023 consumer court case shows that was not universal — one buyer who booked in December 2009 waited until December 2023 for physical possession, more than a decade past the contracted date, and had to go to the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to get compensation. Whether that buyer’s experience was an isolated outlier or representative of a slower tail of deliveries is not something this research could establish with confidence — but it is a documented, adjudicated fact, not a rumor, and it should weigh on how much comfort a prospective buyer takes from “possession already happened for thousands of families.”

The public tribunal listing showing both “RPS Infrastructure Ltd” and “RPS Infrastructure Pvt Ltd” as distinct named parties in separate matters is also worth flagging plainly — a buyer should ask exactly which legal entity will appear on their sale deed and confirm it matches the one actually holding title to the unit.

Risk Assessment — Positive Factors

• The project is physically complete and occupied — this is not a construction-risk bet the way a new launch is; you can walk the towers, inspect a unit, and talk to current residents before committing.
• Amrita Hospital operates within the same RPS City footprint today, not as a “proposed” amenity in a brochure.
• Roughly 6,500 residents already living in the complex provide a real, functioning community and a base of comparable resale transactions to benchmark against.
• The Savana Welfare Association took over society maintenance from the builder in February 2024, which residents frame as an improvement — buyers today are dealing with a resident-run RWA rather than builder-controlled facility management.
• Active resale liquidity exists — 100+ listings were tracked on a major aggregator at the time of this research, meaning exit options are not theoretical.
• Prices have shown upward movement (per aggregator tracking) into 2026, consistent with a mature, established Faridabad micro-market rather than a speculative outer-sector plot scheme.

Risk Assessment — Limitations

• RERA status could not be independently verified. Some portals cite HRERA 660/2017/307, but this review did not find RPS Savana in either the Gurugram-authority or Panchkula-authority (RERA-PKL) registered project listings checked directly on haryanarera.gov.in. Given the project’s pre-2016 origin, it is plausible parts of it fall outside RERA’s registration requirement — but that needs to be confirmed in writing before any transaction, not assumed.
• No transparent, current official price list exists. Asking prices vary meaningfully by listing source, and the reported 12% quarterly rise comes from an aggregator’s modeled average, not registered transaction data — treat it as directional, not precise.
• The developer has a documented, adjudicated history of severe possession delay on this exact project. A 2023 consumer court order confirms an 11-year-plus delay on one 2009 booking, with the company found deficient in service and ordered to pay compensation. Residents separately allege the company avoided paying delay penalties more broadly by citing “escalation free” contract clauses.
• A Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal matter involving RPS Infrastructure Ltd was still listed for hearing as of 21 July 2026 — the nature of that specific dispute is not established from the public cause list, but its existence means the company’s regulatory history is not fully closed.
• The location is fully mature, which cuts both ways. There is no infrastructure upside left to capture here — the area is what it is today. That reduces some risks but also removes the growth thesis some Faridabad buyers are chasing.
• Resale liquidity is real but competes against a market with limited price transparency. Without confirmed comparable sale-deed data (as opposed to asking prices), it is hard for a buyer to know if they are paying a fair rate or an inflated one.
• Buyers should confirm whether they are purchasing genuine resale or lingering builder-held inventory, since RPS Group’s own website still lists the project with indicative pricing — the two carry different documentation and risk profiles.

The Hidden Information Between the Lines

The most important fact about RPS Savana is one that almost never appears in property-portal listings: this project predates the entire regulatory framework that governs how Indian real estate is supposed to work today. Bookings started around 2007, nine years before the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act existed. Every early buyer who signed an agreement in that window did so with none of the protections RERA now provides — no mandatory escrow for construction funds, no statutory possession-delay interest, no centralized regulator to complain to. Some of those buyers are still, per the 2023 court record, waiting for justice more than a decade after their contracted possession date.

The “escalation free” clause residents describe is a good example of how fine print substitutes for accountability. On its face, “escalation free” sounds like a buyer protection — a promise the price won’t go up. In practice, according to residents in the Victims of RPS community, the builder has used the same language to argue it owes no delay-penalty interest either, since the agreement framed the deal as fixed and final in both directions. Whether that reading would survive scrutiny in every individual contract is a legal question specific to each buyer’s paperwork — but the pattern of residents raising the same complaint independently, years apart, is itself informative.

The gap between “ready to move” and “regulatory file closed” also deserves attention. Emerald Heights, another Sector 88 project less than a kilometre away, has a RERA file still showing “Extension Applied” years after its proposed completion date despite being fully occupied. RPS Savana’s situation appears different — this review could not locate an active RERA file for it at all in the registries checked — but the lesson generalizes: “everyone’s already living there” and “the paperwork is in order” are two separate facts, and a buyer needs to verify the second one directly rather than infer it from the first.

Finally, the February 2024 maintenance handover is worth reading as more than a footnote. A society taking 17 years to wrest facility control away from its original developer, and residents describing that fight in terms of “extortion” in their own words, is a strong signal about how adversarial the builder-resident relationship was for a long stretch of this project’s life. That the RWA now runs things is a genuine positive for a buyer today — but it’s worth asking current residents how recent and how complete that transition actually was, rather than assuming it is fully settled.

Questions to Consider Before Investing

• Can the seller or the RWA produce written confirmation of RPS Savana’s current RERA registration status — or its exemption — that I can independently verify on haryanarera.gov.in?
• Which exact legal entity — RPS Infrastructure Limited or RPS Infrastructure Pvt Ltd — will be named on my sale deed, and does that match the entity that currently holds title to this specific unit?
• Am I buying genuine resale from a private owner, or unsold inventory still held by the builder? What documentation differs between the two?
• Can the seller show me the original buyer agreement and confirm there are no outstanding possession-delay compensation claims or disputes tied to this specific unit?
• What are the current, cleared-to-date maintenance and IFMS dues on this unit, and will the Savana Welfare Association confirm them in writing before registry?
• What was the actual registered sale-deed price for a comparable unit in this tower in the last six months, as opposed to the asking price shown on portals?
• Is there any ongoing litigation — consumer court, RERA, or appellate tribunal — connected to this specific tower or unit?
• What is the water source for this unit — municipal supply, borewell, or a mix — and has that ever been a source of shortage for residents?
• How many of the 27 towers, if any, still have unsold builder-held inventory, and does that affect resale pricing dynamics in the towers I’m considering?
• Can I speak with at least two current residents, independent of the seller or any channel partner, about their experience with the RWA and with the builder historically?

Who Should Consider This Project

• End-use buyers who want a fully built, occupied apartment in an established Faridabad neighborhood and are not willing to wait on any construction timeline.
• Buyers who specifically value a functioning on-site hospital (Amrita Hospital) and established social infrastructure over the promise of future development.
• Buyers comfortable doing resale-market due diligence — verifying a specific seller’s documentation, dues, and title — rather than relying on a single builder relationship.
• Investors seeking rental yield in a mature, occupied community with an existing tenant pool, rather than capital appreciation from area development.

Who Should Not Consider This Project

• Buyers who need a clean, unambiguous RERA registration number they can verify in five minutes before committing — this project does not currently offer that clarity.
• Anyone hoping to buy directly from RPS Infrastructure Ltd on a fresh construction-linked payment plan and expecting the delivery discipline that plan implies, given the company’s documented delay history on this exact project.
• Short-term flippers looking for rapid appreciation — the location is mature, and the growth-driven price story has largely already played out.
• Risk-averse buyers who are uncomfortable with a developer that has an adjudicated consumer court finding of service deficiency against it, however old the underlying booking.
• Buyers relying entirely on bank financing who have not first confirmed with their lender whether this specific project’s RERA status (or lack of a clear one) affects loan eligibility.

Honest Verdict

RPS Savana has something most projects reviewed on this site don’t: it actually exists, at scale, with thousands of people already living their daily lives in it. That is a real advantage over a plotted layout or an under-construction tower where the entire thesis rests on a promise. The location inside RPS City, next to an operating hospital, in a genuinely built-up part of Faridabad, is a legitimate strength, and the resident-run RWA taking over maintenance in 2024 suggests the worst of the builder-relationship friction may be behind current buyers rather than ahead of them.

The core problem is not whether the building is real — it is whether the paperwork and the developer’s track record hold up to the same scrutiny a newer, RERA-era project would face. They don’t, cleanly. A RERA registration this review could not verify, a consumer court finding of an 11-year possession delay decided as recently as 2023, residents describing years of unpaid penalty claims, and a legal entity structure with more than one similarly named company appearing in tribunal records — none of that is disqualifying on its own, but together it means a buyer here is trading construction risk for documentation risk and counterparty-history risk.

If you’re buying here, do it as a resale transaction with a lawyer who checks the specific unit’s title chain, dues, and any litigation history — not as a leap of faith based on how many people already live there. Ask for the RERA confirmation in writing and verify it yourself before you sign anything. RPS Savana is a real, livable building with a messy paper trail behind it, and the second half of that sentence matters just as much as the first.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information gathered through independent research as of 29 July 2026. No financial advice is implied. Always consult a RERA-registered real estate agent and an independent property lawyer before making any real estate investment.